B.V.RANGA RAJU, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Gopalakrishna – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the judgment of the learned single Judge in the appeal filed against the judgment and decree in OS. No. 14 of 1981 (on the file of the Additional District Judge, Adilabad ).
( 2 ) THE appellants in this LPA as well as the first appeal are the defendants in the suit. The suit was filed for a declaration of title over a site of 375 Sq. Yards situated within the Municipal limits of Adilabad Town. The plaintiff also sought for restoration of possession of the suit land after removing the temporary structure erected by the defendants. The suit was decreed by the trial Court holding all the issues in favour of the plaintiff on appeal, the trial Court s judgment was confirmed by the impugned judgment. That judgment of the learned single Judge is reported in Pavan Kumar v. K. Gopala Krishna, 1990 (1) A. L. T. 209.
( 3 ) IT is the admitted case that the plot of land, which is the subject-matter of the suit, originally belonged to one Sri Lateef Ahmed. The plaintiff s case is that he purchased from Sri Lateef Ahmed a plot of land measuring 110 x 80 Yards pursuant to an agreement of sale (EX A3) dated 22-4-1952 exe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.