B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
State Bank of India, REP. BY CHIEF General Manager, HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
RAM DAS, SECUNDERABAD – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE cases arise out of an Award passed on 8-8-1984 by the Umpire in the Arbitration proceedings. C. M. A. No. 1805/94 is filed by the State Bank of india and directed against the Judgment in O. P. No. 76/85 on the file of the learned I Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, filed under section 30 and 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to set aside the Award dated 8-8-1984. C. R. P. No. 5283/94 is directed against the Judgment and decree dated 27-4-1993 passed in O. P. No. 968/93 making the Award Rule of the Court. C. R. P. No. 5367/94 is directed against the Judgment and decree in O. S. No. 191/85. The said suit is filed by the Umpire to issue notices to the parties to the arbitration proceedings and for making the Award dated 8-8-1984 passed by the Umpire Rule of the Court. All the matters were disposed of by the learned trial Judge by a common judgment under challenge.
( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience the parties shall be referred to as the petitionerand respondents, as arrayed in CR. P. No. 5283/94.
( 3 ) THE first respondent, M/s. Ramdas Contractors shall be referred to as the contractor and the petitioner as the State Bank of India (for sho
Iveagh(Earl) vs. Min.of Housing
R. vs. Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Prabartak Commercial Corporation vs. Chief Administrator, Dandakaranya Project
Yelluru Mohan Reddy vs. Rashitriya Ispath Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam
Central Warehousing Corporation Construction Cell vs. P.Devendra Raju
Managing Director, Nagarjuna Co op. Sugars Ltd vs. T.K.Mohan Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.