SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 195

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Venkata Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, as at present, is a Corporator of 32nd ward of Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada. He also claims to be an enthusiastic social worker. Though elected on behalf of the Telugu Desam Party (for short tdp ), as a Corporator, has become a close associate to the local Congress M-L. A. It is alleged that his political rivals with a view to eliminate him from Vijayawada political scenario have got him implicated in false criminal cases which ate triable at various places in various Courts at Chittoor, Gudivada and Nandigama. The cases, according to him, are foisted upon him. Many a time his political rivals alleged to have made attempts on his life, even in and around the Court premises, whenever he was appearing in the Court in connection with the criminal cases pending against him. On account of his popularity and image he had earned good name for himself within a short period of time and the same become eye-sore for his political rivals. According to him, the main reason to take revenge against him by his political rivals is that he was elected as Corporator as a TDP nominee; but, subsequently joined in Congress party along with one




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top