SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 399

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, V.BHASKARA RAO
B. Kistaiah – Appellant
Versus
Government of India – Respondent


( 1 ) BOTH these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as common questions arise for consideration. This is a tell tale story of unscrupulous litigants abusing the judicial process. They were aided and abetted by vested interests. It is a saga of naked abuse of this Court s Forum and the device of public interest litigation. We cannot help, except to feel distress as to how this Court was taken for a ride. More about it at a later stage. We would, briefly, indicate the facts in both these writ petitions.

( 2 ) WRIT Petition - WPNo. 5717 of 1997 is filed by ft former Member of the Legislative Assembly representing Shadnagar Constituency and a resident of Hyderabad. The said writ petition is filed on 18-3-1997. The petitioner in the writ petition, prays for issuance of an appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in abusing of power vested by law under Sections 12-Eand 13 and other provisions of Chapter III of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and attracting the provisions of Section 23 of the Central Excise Act, resulting in loss of Central Excise Revenue to a tune of about Rs. 490 Crores in Hyderabad Division and in dismantling the Special Investigation Tea
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top