SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 474

S.V.MARUTHI
T. Venkaeshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in CC No. 482 of 1995 before the XXII Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-Mahila Court, Hyderabad (for short the Mahila Court ).

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows: The 1st petitioner married the 2nd respondent on 31-1-1985. At the time of marriage he was working with M/s. Raasi Ceramic Industries, Hyderabad. They have two children bom on 25-10-1985 and 5-6-1987. Towards the end of 1986, a Swedish Company selected the 1st petitioner as a Technical Consultant/ceramic Design Engineer, initially for a period of six months which was extended further in November, 19s7. The 2nd respondent joined the 1st petitioner along with her two children, Smt. Anusuya, the elder sister of the 2nd respondent and Sri Narayana, the brother-in-law of the 2nd respondent at the expense of the 1st petitioner. Subsequently differences cropped between the 1 st petitioner and the 2nd respondent which led to a decree of divorce granted by the District Court in Nacka, Sweden on 28-3-1994 under the Swedish Marriage Code of Judicial Procedure. On 2-11-1994 the Swedish Court granted the custody of children to the 2nd respondent who also
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top