SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 745

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, N.SANJEEVA REDDY
Government Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
J. SRIDEVI – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ appeal, the ranks of the parties mentioned as in the writ petition.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is by respondents 1,2 and 4 in W. P. No. 5929/97 aggrievedby the order of the learned single Judge of this Court allowing the writ petition filed by the petitioners who sought reliefs of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent authority to declare the land of 1000 Sq. metres of each of the petitioners is outside the purview of the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act of 1976; to direct the 3rd respondent for sanction of the layout and also to direct the 4th respondent for entertaining the registration of the sale deeds.

( 3 ) A few facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as fallows: The petitioners purchased each an extent of 10 guntas or 1000 Sq. metres from the pattadars of the land in S. No. 79 part of Madapur village, serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy district. At the time of purchase, the land in question was an agricultural land. As per the plan dt: 21-8-1978 prepared by the competent authorities of Survey and Land Records, Urban land Ceiling, Hyderabad, the Muncipal limits of Hyderabad and secunderabad is





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top