SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 958

B.S.RAIKOTE
Dokala Buchiraju – Appellant
Versus
Dokala Bangaramma (since died) – Respondent


B. S. RAIKOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed by the original defendant challenging the judgment and order dated 21-8-1998 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur on I. A. No. 935/1997 in O. S. No. 45/1997.

( 2 ) BY the impugned order, Beela Parvati has been brought on record as the legal representative of the deceased sole respondent Dokala Bangaramma on the basis of the registered Will dated 8-1-1997, marked in the case as ex. A-1.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the Will is not proved according to law and there are suspicious circumstances and the Will is a fabricated document at the instance of P. W. I, Beela Maheswara rao, the husband of Parvati. He further submitted that on the basis of the will, a person cannot be permitted to continue the suit in view of the judgment of this Court reported in A. Apparao vs. K. Ammoru. He submitted mat at any rate, the deceased was not of sound disposing state of mind and as such the will is not genuine. The lands are situated at Polavaram, within the jurisdiction of the Sub-Registrar, Polavaram, whereas, the Will is registered at rajahmundry. In fact, his client had filed Ex. B-6, a notice bef





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top