SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 38

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Bahagyah Bai – Appellant
Versus
Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda, R. R. District – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dt. 13-3-1996 passed by the Special Tribunal under Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act (Chief Judge, city Civil Court ). The learned Chief Judge directed the petitioner-plaintiff to produce his evidence before the respondents-defendants are called upon to adduce their evidence.

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein filed the suit - O. S. No. 3375 of 1986 (on the file of the V Asst. Judge, City Civil Court) for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents etc. , from interfering with the possession of plaintiff in respect of the suit land measuring Ac. 1-20 guntas in Sy. No. 129 (old) and Sy. No. 403 (new) situate at Sheikpet village, Banjara Hills. A written statement was filed on behalf of the defendants contending that the land in question is a Government land, that the plaintiffs were bent upon encroaching the Government land and they were taking steps to sell it away illegally. Before the suit came up for trial, the defendants contended before the V Assistant judge on whose file the case was pending that in view of the act of grabbing of Government land, the case falls within the purview



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top