SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 162

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Sardar Prahlad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Syed Ali Musa Raza – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE Appellant who is the Defendant No. 1 in O. S. No. 331/80 (old 54/78) has challenged the Judgment and decree of the learned Addl. Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad dt. 15-1-1983 passed in favour of respondents 1 to 3 who were the plaintiffs in the suit for recovery of the possession of the suit property after demolishing the structure thereon and by evicting the defendants therefrom. The respondent No. 4 herein is the defendant No. 2 in the suit. The suit property is a portion of S. No. 129/55 (old) New Sy. No. 165 to an extent of 2125 sq. yards out of 3500 sq. yards and Ac. 3-26 guntas situated at Kancha Tattikhana Sivar, Shaikpet village, Banjara Hills, (Jubilee Hills) hyderabad described in the plaint schedule. One Saraf-e-Khas Mubarak, its original pattadar transferred it in the name of the plaintiffs father Syed Shah abdul Khader on 25-Azur 1340 Fasli (30-10-1930) and he in turn transferred it to his wife Fathima Soghra under a settlement deed dt. 10th Aban 1347 fasli (5-9-1938 ). Fathima Soghra died on 24-7-1973 leaving behind her the plaintiffs, her children, as legal heirs, who succeeded to the said land after her death. It was alleged





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top