SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 189

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Yarlagadda Venkakka Choudary (dead) – Appellant
Versus
Daggubati Lakshminarayana (dead) – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE judgment and decree of the learned Sub-Judge, Chirala (Mr. B. Eswara reddy) in O. S. No. 61 of 1971 dated 9-3-1981 are challenged in this appeal. The suit was dismissed with costs. Obviously aggrieved by the judgment and decree, the appellants who are the plaintiffs in the suit preferred this appeal. The respondents are the defendants. There are two plaintiffs and 26 defendants in the suit. Defendant No. l died during the pendency of the suit and defendants 2 to 26 were brought on record as the legal representatives of defendant No. 1. Convenience warrants to refer the parties as plaintiffs and defendants.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed of recovery of possession of the suit schedule lands, for past mesne profits for a period of three years, for future mesne profits after enquiry, for costs and for such other reliefs as the Court may deem fit to grant in the nature of the case.

The suit schedule lands are subjected to the plaint schedule as follows:

1.

D. No346/3

Seri dry land measuring

Ac. 4. 40


2.

D. No. 331/2

-do-

Ac. 4. 49


3.

D. No. 477

Seri wet land

Ac. 4. 21


4.

D. No. 481/3

-do-

Ac. 0. 50


5.

D. No. 142/1

-do-

Ac. 3. 86


Total

Ac. 17. 46


all the defendant
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top