B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Yarlagadda Venkakka Choudary (dead) – Appellant
Versus
Daggubati Lakshminarayana (dead) – Respondent
( 1 ) THE judgment and decree of the learned Sub-Judge, Chirala (Mr. B. Eswara reddy) in O. S. No. 61 of 1971 dated 9-3-1981 are challenged in this appeal. The suit was dismissed with costs. Obviously aggrieved by the judgment and decree, the appellants who are the plaintiffs in the suit preferred this appeal. The respondents are the defendants. There are two plaintiffs and 26 defendants in the suit. Defendant No. l died during the pendency of the suit and defendants 2 to 26 were brought on record as the legal representatives of defendant No. 1. Convenience warrants to refer the parties as plaintiffs and defendants.
( 2 ) THE suit was filed of recovery of possession of the suit schedule lands, for past mesne profits for a period of three years, for future mesne profits after enquiry, for costs and for such other reliefs as the Court may deem fit to grant in the nature of the case.
The suit schedule lands are subjected to the plaint schedule as follows:
1.
D. No346/3
Seri dry land measuring
Ac. 4. 40
2.
D. No. 331/2
-do-
Ac. 4. 49
3.
D. No. 477
Seri wet land
Ac. 4. 21
4.
D. No. 481/3
-do-
Ac. 0. 50
5.
D. No. 142/1
-do-
Ac. 3. 86
Total
Ac. 17. 46
all the defendant
Chatrathi Jagannadha Rao vs. M/s. Jatmal Madanlal Jakotia Firm
Serandayya Filial vs. Shankaralingam Pillai
Garimella Annapoornayya vs. K.Appalanarasimha Murthy
Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd., Madurai vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
P.Krishna Bhatta vs. M.Ganapathi Bhatta
C.K.Anavema Reddi Vs Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal (Addl. District Judge) Cuddapah
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.