SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 323

V.BHASKARA RAO
Cheemakurthi Sree Krishna, Mohan Rao – Appellant
Versus
Naragani Nagabhushanam – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE three Civil Revision Petitions are interconnected and they are directed against three separate orders in different Interlocutory Applications in O. S. No. 42 of 1988 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Eluru. Hence they are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to these three Civil Revision petitions are as under : the Revision Petitioners herein are plaintiffs in O. S. No. 468 of 1987. The case is said to be at the stage of arguments as both sides have adduced oral and documentary evidence. At this stage, the petitioners herein came to know that P. W. 2 is having certain documents in his possession and hence they filed i. A. No. 1475 of 1996 under Order 13 Rule 2 C. P. C. seeking permission to file the same by explaining the reasons for their failure to produce the same earlier. An affidavit of P. W. 2 is filed in support of the petition. They also filed i. A. No. 1476 of 1996 under Order 18 Rule 17-A to recall P. W. 2 for the purpose of marking those documents and I. A. No. 1477 of 1996 under Section 151 C. P. C. to re-open the case. No counters are filed by other side. The learned Munsif held th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top