SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 695

R.BAYAPU REDDY
Merla (Bolla) Jogayamma – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , rep. by the Authorised officer, Land Reforms, Kakinada – Respondent


R. BAYAPU REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions are filed by the petitioners therein questioning the respective orders of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Kakinada, by which the plea of the petitioners, who are the declarants, for exclusion of certain lands from their holdings during the surrender proceedings was rejected.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner in C. R. P. 3401/94 is the declarant in L. C. C. No. 913/kda/75. After due enquiry, the primary tribunal by its orders dated 25-3-1985 finally determined that the declarant is surplus holder and issued notice in Form No. VI directing her to surrender the excess land which was determined at 0. 2363 standard holdings. The declarant accepted the said orders and proposed to surrender the land bearing Sy. No. 201 of Gandepalli village. After publishing notice in Form No. VIII calling for objections and after obtaining the suitability report, the primary tribunal accepted the surrender of the said land by orders dated 3-5-1989 and directed the concerned officer to take possession of the land from the declarant. Thereupon, notice in Form no. IX was issued to the declarant by the Revenue Divisional Officer, peddapuram requiring her to deliv










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top