K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
State Of A. P. represented by District Collector, Nellore – Appellant
Versus
Chevireddi Venkatakrishna Reddy – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order passed by the Subordinate Judge, Kovvur, in O. P. 63/92, dated 28-7-1994, whereby the panel arbitrators have been directed to adjudicate the dispute afresh giving opportunity to both sides.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts which are no longer in dispute before me are that the respondent was entrusted with the work of execution of North Feeder Channel from K. M. 1. 60 to 5. 6 of Somasila Project by the Superintending Engineer, Somasila Project, Nellore and the agreement was executed vide agreement No. 9/se/77-78. There was a term in this agreement that in case of dispute, the matter could be referred to the arbitration of the Chief Engineer, P. W. D. (Randd), Deputy Secretary to the Government, Finance and Planning Department and the Director of Accounts, Sriramsagar Project. The respondent-Contractor, alleging that correct measurement was not done and he was entitled to claim more amount from the Superintending Engineer for the work done, referred the dispute to the panel of arbitrators mentioned above. The arbitrators passed their award on 3-6-1986 whereby the claim of the respondent-contractor was reject
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.