SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1104

K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
State Of A. P. represented by District Collector, Nellore – Appellant
Versus
Chevireddi Venkatakrishna Reddy – Respondent


KRISHNA SARAN SHRIVASTAV J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order passed by the Subordinate Judge, Kovvur, in O. P. 63/92, dated 28-7-1994, whereby the panel arbitrators have been directed to adjudicate the dispute afresh giving opportunity to both sides.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts which are no longer in dispute before me are that the respondent was entrusted with the work of execution of North Feeder Channel from K. M. 1. 60 to 5. 6 of Somasila Project by the Superintending Engineer, Somasila Project, Nellore and the agreement was executed vide agreement No. 9/se/77-78. There was a term in this agreement that in case of dispute, the matter could be referred to the arbitration of the Chief Engineer, P. W. D. (Randd), Deputy Secretary to the Government, Finance and Planning Department and the Director of Accounts, Sriramsagar Project. The respondent-Contractor, alleging that correct measurement was not done and he was entitled to claim more amount from the Superintending Engineer for the work done, referred the dispute to the panel of arbitrators mentioned above. The arbitrators passed their award on 3-6-1986 whereby the claim of the respondent-contractor was reject














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top