SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 134

G.BIKSHAPATHY, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Muddasani Venkata Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE above Appeal is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad in o. P. SRNo. 842 of 1995, dated: 18-8-1995. The 1 stappellantis the husband, while the 2nd appellant is the wife. The marriage between the 1 st Appellant and 2nd Appellant took place on 15-8-1993 under Hindu customs at secunderabad. The marriage was consummated and the Appellants lived to gether for a month after the marriage. Thereafter it appears that the relations between the Appellants strained and they could not reconcile themselves. Even the interference by the elders ended in no results. Under those circumstances, the appellants have mutually decided to dissolve the marriage by filing Application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. As the 1st appellant was residing in U. S. A. , he had executed a special powerof Attomey in favour of one Sri Kasi Reddy Ram Reddy to file necessary applications before the competent court. Accordingly the petition was filed before the Family Court, duly signed by the Special power of Attorney holder on behalf of the husband and wife herself signed the Application and they were presented before the Family court o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top