SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1018

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Ankinapalli Yanadamma – Appellant
Versus
G. Sreenivasulu Reddy – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THESE six appeals sprout from the award and the decision of the Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Nellore in O. P. No. 327 of 1985 and the series, out of which the subject matters of the appeals are the O. P. Nos. 327, 328, 329, 425, 426 and 443 of 1985 respectively. The appellants are the claimants in the respective petitions filed under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (for short the Act ). The respondents in the appeals were the two respondents before the Tribunal. All the petitions arising out of the same motor vehicle accident were tried together by recording common evidence and disposed of by means of common judgment by the Tribunal. Similarly, these appeals involving common questions of law and facts have been heard together and are being disposed of by means of this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE particulars of the respective claims are tabulated as herein:- Sl.

No.

O. P. No.

(CMA)

Appeal No.

Appellants

Claim Rs.

Award Rs.

Remarks


1.

327/1985

1137/1990

Claimants/l. Rs.

of the deceased

1,59,850/-

25,200/-

Partly allowed (death case)


2.

328/1985

1178/1990

-do-

1,59. 850/-

30,120/-

-do-


3.

329/1985

1182/1990

-do-

1,59,850/-

30,120/-

-do-


4.




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top