SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1064

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST – Appellant
Versus
YELLAPPA APPALANAIDU – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant is the appellant. The respondent-plaintiff filed the suit fora declaration that the order of removal of the plaintiff from service is illegal, and for a consequential relief of reinstatement into service together with a sum of rs. 12,500/- being the arrears of salary from 1-7-1978 till the date of the suit and lor future salaries.

( 2 ) THE respondent-plaintiff was appointed on 7-2-1968 as Gangman in the engineering Department of the appellant-Port Trust. After he worked for about 10 years, he was directed to undergo medical examination by an order dated 10-5-1978 along with others. He was declared medically unfit on 26-6-1978 by the appellant and his services were terminated with effect from the said date on the ground that he was suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis. In fact he had not suffered from it at any time. Therefore he approached King George hospital, Visakhapatnam and the District Tuberculosis Control Hospital, visakhapatnam subjecting himself for medical tests and both the hospitals issued certificates that he had not been suffering from Tuberculosis. On the strength of the said certificates, the petitioner filed a representa














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top