SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 67

S.R.NAYAK
Vangala Narasimhacharyulu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) ONE Vangala Narasimha-charyulu, Professor of Physics has filed this writ petition as a public interest litigation seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in proposing to sell the properties of Sri Kesavaswamy temple, Kothalaparru village, to an extent Of Acs. 3-00 from out of Acs. 6-82 cents comprised in R. S. No. 27 of Pandithavilluru village, Poduru mandal, West Godavari district by way of private negotiation or otherwise than by a public auction as illegal and arbitrary. Further he has sought for a consequential direction to the respondents 1 to 4 not to complete the said sale transaction in favour of the fifth respondent by private negotiations.

( 2 ) THE respondents 4 to 5 on service of notice have filed their respective counters whereas no counter is filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. The facts are many and legal contentions raised are also many. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I found that the writ petition is entitled to be allowed on a short ground in the light of the decision of the Apex Court rendered in the case of-Chenchu Rami Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1986 SC 1158 and R. Venugopala








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top