D.H.NASIR, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Prasad and Company, K. S. Raju, Managing Partner, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Chittoor – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the II Addl. Judge, City Civil Court/ Hyderabad in O. P. No. 124/84 which is an application Hied under Sections 30 and 33 of the arbitration Act by respondents 1 and 2 herein objecting to the award dated 1-10-1983 made by the arbitrator. The impugned judgment is a common judgment ni the aforesaid O. P. and O. S. No. l514/83 filed by the arbitrator under section 14 (2) of the Act. The arbitrator-a retired Chief Engineer was appointed by the Court on an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act. The award was partly set aside in so far as Claim No. 3 was concerned and the rest of the award was made the Rule of the Court. The Court awarded interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realisation.
( 2 ) THE details relating to the disputed claims are: claim No. 2: Payment for the extra leads for rubble, sand and metal. Amount of claim: Rs. 14,69,423/ -. and the claim was partly allowed for Rs. 10,63,651/ -. Claim No. 3: Payment of escalation charges: As against the claim of rs. 47,00,000/-, the amount partly allowed was R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.