SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 728

AVINASH SOMAKANT BHATE
Sukhdev Pershad @ L. R. Durga Pershad – Appellant
Versus
B. Kishanlal – Respondent


AVINASH SOMAKANT BHATE, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions are being disposed of by a common judgment as they arise out of the same judgment of the trial Court.

( 2 ) SUIT O. S. No. 59 of 1958 was filed for accounts. A preliminary decree was passed on 14-11-1958. Against that an appeal was preferred which was dismissed on 16-11-1963. In Supreme Court also the appeal was dismissed on 14-9-1966. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed an application LA. No51 of 1976 for passing of a final decree which was ultimately passed on 17-11-1977. Against this final decree the defendants preferred an appeal C. C. C. A. No. 78 of 1978, which was dismissed on 10-3-1987. The E. P. was filed in 1992 but was dismissed qn 16-2-1994. Thereafter, E. P. 15 of 1994 was filed before the executing Court for executing the decree against the judgment debtors.

( 3 ) THE judgment debtors had contested the E. P. It was contended that the e. P. was not maintainable as it was barred by limitation. Another point raised was that the amount which was deposited or paid by the judgment debtors should first be appropriated towards principal amount and not towards interest.

( 4 ) THE learned trial Judge by the impugned order accepted





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top