( 1 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the appellant

( 2 ) WE propose take notice of the facts of the case for the purpose of considering whether the writ petitioner- appellant had any justification to invoke the extraordinary writ Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India. Writ petitioner - appellant has claimed that he is the cultivating tenant of the lands in question. He has raised accordingly a proceeding before the Special Officer-cum-District Munsif for declaration of his tenancy rights and for permanent injunctior Petitioner-appellant has, in the said proceeding, filed an interlocutory appucation for temporary injunction, pending disposal of the proceeding. The special Officer-cum-District Munsif initially granted interim injunction, but vacated the same after hearing the respondents and finally disposed of the proceeding. The Petitioner-appellant preferred appeal before the District Judge, i. e. , appellate authority. The appellate authority has, however, dismissed the appeal. The petitioner-appellant has thereafter filed a petition invoking this Court s extraordinary jurisdiction seeking a direction to quash the order passed by the