G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the Judgment of the learned District Judge, at Rajahmundry in A. T. A. No. 15 of 1992 allowing the same and granting interim injunction against the revision petitioner in I. A. No. 365 of 1991 in A. T. C. No. 31/1991.

( 2 ) THE first respondent had taken a preliminary objection before the learned single Judge of this Court contending that since the proceedings arose out of andhra Tenancy Act, revision is not maintainable under Section 115 C. P. C. The learned Single Judge N. D. Patnaik, J. , in his order dated 5-3-1993 observed as follows:-" Since this question involves a matter of considerable importance under the Andhra Tenancy Act, I feel that it is desirable that an authoritative pronouncement by a Division Bench on this aspectis required. I, therefore, refer the following questions for decision by a Division Bench: 1. Whether a revision lies to the High Court under Section 115 C. P. C. against an order passed by the District Judge u/s 16 (2) of A. P. (Andhra area) Tenancy Act?2. If no revision lies under Section 115 C. P. C what is the remedy of the aggrieved party - is it by way of filing a revision petition unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document