SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 970

G.BIKSHAPATHY
Mohd. Afzal Khan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Hyderabad – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE Writ Petition was initially filed seeking direction to 1 st respondent not to dispose of the case in file No. B2/8986/91 on the file of the 2nd respond ent and to make over the matter to 2nd respondent for passing appropriate orders. However, in view of the intervening circumstances, an amendment to prayer was sought and the same was allowed. I shall discuss them in detail after referring to the events in the Writ Petition.

( 2 ) AN extent of Ac. 3-09 guntas was purchased by the father of Writ Petitioners and one Sri Mohammed Afzal Khan in s. No. 74 and 75 (part), Baghlingampally, nallakunta, Hyderabad under registered sale deed dated 13th Meher 1333 Fasli vide document No. 1629. The land was orally gifted to the mother of Writ Petitioners and a registered gift deed was also executed on 21st Sherewar 1351 Fasli. In 1966 when nasrulla Khan and Vidyasagar Reddy were attempting to encroach, the mother of the petitioner (Smt. Samdani Begum) filed suit for perpetual injunction and the same was decreed on 30-10-1972. The land was sold to several parties viz. Padmacooperative housing Society, Balaji Bhagyanagar cooperative Housing Society, some lands were acqui


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top