SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 141

A.LAKSHMANA RAO, P.L.N.SHARMA, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Nalgonda Co-operative Marketing society Limited – Appellant
Versus
Labour Court, Hyd, rep. , by its Presiding Officer, Hyderabad – Respondent


( 1 ) THE following question came up for consideration in this writ appeal before a Division Bench of this Court:"whether a Labour Court constituted under Section 7 of the Industrial disputes Act and designated as a second appellate authority under the andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act is entitled to condone the delay in filing Second Appeal by virtue of the provisions contained under section 5 of the Limitation Act. "in view of the importance of the question, the learned Judges were of the opinion that the matter required to be considered by a Full Bench and therefore, they passed the order of reference dated June 17,1991, in the following terms:"it is evident from the foregoing that the decisions of the Supreme Court, nor of this Court are uniform on this very important question. We are of the opinion that it is necessary that the controversy relating to the application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 29 (2) of the Limitation act to proceedings before a Labour Court constituted under Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act has to be decided by a Full Bench of this Court. One other question which incidentally arises is as to whether Section 29 (2) o











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top