SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 44

M.N.RAO, M.RANGA REDDY, P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
E. Sumathamma – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) (AT the Stage of Admission) This petition is filed seeking writ of habeas corpus questioning theorder dated 22-12-1993 passed by the second respondent in Cr. No. 4904 / 93 / Fl directing detention of the petitioner s husband - E. Thirupathi Reddy - for a period of three months on the allegation that he is acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order since he is indulging in sale of uncertified and cheap liquor endangering public health.

( 2 ) WHEN the writ petition came up for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court comprising two of us - M. N. Rao and P. Ramakrishnam Raju, JJ. , - one of the contentions raised before the Division Bench was that neither the impugned order of detention nor the grounds supplied to the detenu specifically mentioned that the detenu is a boot legger and, therefore, the order is vitiated on that ground on the authority of two Division Bench judgments of this Court in C. Venkataiah vs. Commissioner of Police and Shaik Shikinder vs. Govt. of A. P.

( 3 ) IN Venkataiah s case, a Division Bench of this Court was of the opinion that unless the satisfaction of a particular type covered by Section 3 (1) of the A. P. Prevention of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top