SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 85

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Vaditho Anantharao Naik – Appellant
Versus
Bhoomisetty Rajaiah – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this CRP. , the order passed by the learned Munsif Magistrate, Vinukonda dated 29-7-1993 in CFR No. 1536/93 in an un-numbered suit filed by the petitioner herein is questioned.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men from intefering with the plaintiff s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule land. According to plaint averments, the defendant entered into an agreement of sale in respect of the plaint schedule land on 30-7-92 and put the plaintiff in possession on the same date after receiving the entire balance of sale consideration. Thereafter, the petitioner has been raising crops and remained in effective possession of the land. The petitioner-plaintiff further alleged that the defendant and his men were trying to interfere with his possession. Hence the suit was filed.

( 3 ) IT is stated in the plaint that the suit is passed on possessory title of the plaintiff and the plaintiff reserves his right to file a suit for specific performance of contract. In the impugned order, the learned Munsif Magistrate relied upon the judgment of this Court in Mohd. Jahangir vs. Mallikharjuna Co-




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top