MOTILAL B. NAIK, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revision petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as the questions raised therein are one and the same.

( 2 ) C. R. P. No. 2010 OF 1993 arises out of the judgment dated 31. 3. 93 passed in O. P. No. 27 of 1992 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Karimnagar and C. R. P. No. 9 of 1994 arises out of the judgment dated 18. 11. 1993 passed in O. P. No. 69 of 1993 on the file of the same court.

( 3 ) PETITIONER is a contractor. He was entrusted with the work relating to "each work excavation and forming embankment of DBM-31 from K. M. 5. 00 to K. M. 7. 00 of Kakatiya canal of Sri Ramsagar Project" vide agreement No. 1/1982-93, dated 24. 4. 1982 by the Government. According to one of the clauses in the agreement, the petitioner has to complete the work within twelve months from the date of handing over the site, which was handed over on 5. 3. 1982. It is also one of the clauses that if any dispute arises between the parties in respect of execution of work, the same may be referred to arbitrators named in the said agreement. According to clause (3) of the agreement, a panel of arbitrators is named as per the value of the dispute between the part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document