SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(AP) 254

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, LINGARAJA RATH
A.Venkatramaiah - Appellant
Versus
Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. - Respondent
Decided On : 06-23-94

Exemption from educational qualification granted for appointment to a lower post does not automatically extend to promotional posts.

Headnote:

PROMOTION - FIELD ASSISTANT - SENIOR FIELD DEMONSTRATOR - EXEMPTION FROM DIPLOMA IN AGRICULTURE - APPLICABILITY TO PROMOTIONAL POSTS - VALIDITY - CLASSIFICATION BASED ON EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION - DISCRIMINATION WITHIN CADRE - RELAXATION OF QUALIFICATION FOR APPOINTMENT - EFFECT ON FUTURE PROMOTIONS - REQUIREMENTS FOR PROMOTION - MATRICULATION WITH DIPLOMA IN AGRICULTURE AND 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE - EXEMPTION GRANTED FOR REGULAR APPOINTMENT AS FIELD MAN - NOT APPLICABLE FOR PROMOTION TO SENIOR FIELD DEMONSTRATOR - GRADUATE WITH 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE - NO EVIDENCE OF GRADUATE QUALIFICATION - CLAIM FOR PROMOTION REJECTED.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, a Field Assistant in the respondent-Organisation, sought promotion to the post of Senior Field Demonstrator with effect from 1-1-1977. He had been granted four advance increments in recognition of his past service of 9 years, including 5 years as a Field Man in the Agricultural Stations and 3 years as Field Man on Model Agronomical experiments. The Area Manager recommended his promotion, stating that he had been exempted from passing the Agricultural Diploma Course and the farm training course required for appointment as Sub-assistant in the Agricultural Department. However, the promotion was denied as he did not meet the requirements for promotion to Senior Field Demonstrator, which included Matriculation with a Diploma in Agriculture and 5 years experience, among other qualifications.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the exemption granted to the appellant for his regular appointment as a Field Man would not aid him for the purpose of promotion to the post of Senior Field Demonstrator. The court also held that the appellant was not entitled to promotion under the requirement of being a graduate with 5 years experience, as there was no evidence that he had obtained the graduate qualification.

Issues: 1. Whether the exemption granted to the appellant from passing the Diploma in Agriculture course was applicable to promotional posts. 2. Whether the appellant was entitled to promotion under the requirement of being a graduate with 5 years experience.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Educational qualification can be the basis for a valid classification for appointment/promotion to a higher post. 2. Persons appointed to a rank after relaxation of the educational qualifications belong to a common cadre and no discrimination can be made within the cadre so far as future promotions are concerned. 3. Where promotion is made dependent upon possession of a specific qualification, the qualification so required being necessary to the requirements of the post, the classification is valid and no exception can be taken to the prescribed qualifications. 4. An exemption granted for recruitment to the lower post would not enure to the benefit of the exempted for promotion.

Final Decision: The writ appeal was dismissed, but without costs.

( 1 ) THE Writ Petitioner is the appellant. Against the judgment of the learned single Judge rejecting his claim for promotion as Senior Field Demonstrator, in the respondent-Organisation with effect from 1-1-1977, this appeal has been preferred.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed as Field Assistant in the respondent-Organisation on 16-10-1971. Prior to it, he had worked as a Field Man for 5 years in the Agricultural Stations, Government of Andhra Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University. Thereafter, he had worked for 3 years as Field Man on Model Agronomical experiments on ryot fields in West Godavari and Guntur Districts and had also worked for one year as Field Man in Pilot Survey on Pests and diseases on paddy in West Godavari District and came to be appointed in the respondent-Organisation with 9 years of experience, and it is his case that in recognition of his past service, he was granted four advance increments in the time scale of pay. He made a move, after he was promoted as Junior Field Demonstrator, for being promoted as a Senior Field Demonstrator with effect from 1-1-1977. The Area Manager of the respondents recommended his case for promotion on 17-5-1980 to the Assistant Personnel Officer stating that the appellant had been exempted from passing Agricultural Diploma Course for appointment as Senior Field Demonstrator and was also exempted from undergoing farm training course, which is equivalent to Agricultural Diploma required for appointment as Sub-assistant in the Agricultural Department, at present, Village Development Officer in the Panchayat Raj Department. As no action was taken, the writ petition was filed. In the counter-affidavit, the stand adopted by the respondent was that for promotion to the rank of senior Field Demonstrator, the requirements were any one of the following : (1) Matriculation with a Diploma in Agriculture and 5 years experience. (2) Graduate with 5 years experience. (3) Matriculation with a certificate course in Agriculture and 7 years experience. (4) Matriculation with Agricultural subjects and 3 years experience. (5) Under stagnation scheme - 10 years experience.

( 3 ) AS the appellant did not meet any of the requirements, he was not promoted; but was due to be promoted as per Clause No. 5 mentioned in supra, in the year 1981 when he would have completed 10 years of service as Field Assistant. The learned single Judge came to the conclusion that the exemption granted to the appellant was only for the purpose of his appointment as Field Man or Field Assistant, but that the exemption was not applicable to the promotional posts and hence the appellant could not claim promotion on the basis of the exemption given earlier.

( 4 ) MR. Viswanadham, the learned Counsel for the appellant, strenuously urges that as the back service of the appellant rendered for 9 years and recognised and he had been granted four increments for the reason, it must be taken that the exemption granted to him from passing the Diploma in Agriculture course was good for all times, and hence, he was entitled to be promoted as Senior Field Demonstrator even under the first requirement as the appellant had passed Matriculation and got 5 years of experience also.

( 5 ) IT is not in dispute that the appellant had 5 years experience. It appears from the judgment under appeal that exemption was granted to the appellant, as per exemption letter dated 17-3-1962, in the following words : "under the powers delegated to the Heads of Departments in G. O. Ms. No. 2024, General Administration (Services-A) Department dated 26-12-1958, the relevant rules are hereby relaxed with effect from 2-1-1960 in favour of the candidates mentioned in the Annexure to this order, so as to enable their regular appointment in the posts now held by them under emergency provision". The learned single Judge was of the view that the exemption was given only to make the regular appointment under emergency




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top