P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THESE two Letters patent Appeals are filed by the plaintiff and the subsequent purchaser respectively, questioning the decree and Judgment in C. C. C. A. 3 / 83, allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 791 / 79 on the file of the II additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) AS the subject-matter is the same and the parties are also common in both the L. P. As. they are disposed of by this common judgment. The parties in the appeals will be referred to as they are arrayed in the main L. P. A. 216 / 86.

( 3 ) THE first respondent entered into an oral agreement on 3-2-1978 with the appellant, being minor, represented by his father as guardian, to purchase a ground-floor mulgi bearing Municipal No. 3-3-38 at Subash Road, Secunderabad as described in the plaint schedule for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- and has paid an advance amount of Rs. 1,000/- on the same date through a demand draft in favour of the minor-1st respondent issued by Andhra Bank, Rashtrapati Road, secunderabad. In fact, the first respondent s husband was running a watch repairing shop in the said premises, by name Khan Watch Company. The appellant s father has similarly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document