G. RADHAKRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of O. P. No. 129 of 1988 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dated 18-4-1991 by which the learned Subordinate Judge enhanced the compensation by Rs. 60/- per square yard over and above the compensation of Rs. 20/- granted by the Land Acquisition Officer, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, hereinafter referred to, for short, as "huda"; in other words, fixing the market value of the land acquired at Rs. 80/- per square yard. Having been aggrieved by the enhancement granted by the learned Subordinate Judge, the Land Acquisition Officer, HUDA preferred A. S. No. 2087 of 1991. Claimant has also preferred A. S. No. 1565 of 1991 claiming a total compensation at the rate of Rs. 200/- per square yard.

( 2 ) AS both the appeals arise out of the same judgment, both the appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment.

( 3 ) IN order to appreciate the proper questions of law and fact involved in the matter, it would be necessary to refer to the salient features of the case, which are briefly as follows:- a total extent of Ac. 14-35 guntas, situate in Survey No. 161 of Mylardevpalli village and S.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document