SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 265

S.DASARADHA RAMA REDDY
V. Devaraju – Appellant
Versus
Sivappa – Respondent


S. DASARADHA RAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dt. 11-12-1987 in I. A. No. 409/1987 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Addl. District Judge, Madanapalle refusing to restore I. A. No. 201/87 filed by the appellant-claimant and which was dismissed for default. The appellant-claimant has filed Original Petition in the Tribunal with a delay of 82 days and filed I. A. No. 201/87 praying the Courts to condone the delay. No appeal has been preferred by the claimant against I. A. No. 201 /87 dismissing the application for condonation of delay, which has resulted in dismissal of the O. P. itself.

( 2 ) PRELIMINARY objection has been taken by the office at the time of admission that the C. M. A. is not maintainable under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, as the order passed in I. A. No. 409/87 is not anaward. I up hold the objection of the office. In Babumiyan vs. Mastan, a Division Bench of this Court has held that the order refusing to condone the delay in filing the claim petition has the effect or flnalty disposing of the original petition, that such an order can, therefor , be treated as an award and hence it is appealab






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top