P.A.CHOUDHARY, PUNNAIAH
Babumiyan and Mastan – Appellant
Versus
K. Seethayamma – Respondent
( 1 ) THE respondents herein filed I. A. No. 54 of 1983 for condemnation of delay in filing O. P. No. 1 of 1983 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad under S. 110a (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act r/w Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act. The Tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the I. A. No. 54 of 1983 on payment of costs of Rs. 100. 00 to allow each respondent. Aggrieved with the order allowing the interlocutory application the petitioner (respondents 1 and 2) preferred CMASR No. 62425 of 1983 in this Court.
( 2 ) THE office took an objection that the appeal does not lie and the officer asked the counsel for the appellants to convert the CMA into CRP. For taking this objection and for urging the counsel to convert the CMA into revision the office relied upon the decision of a Bench of this Court in CMA No. 612 of 1977 dated 3-4-1978.
( 3 ) THE said CMA was directed against the order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chittoor condoning the delay in filing the claim petition. The Claims Tribunal condoned the delay inv0king the proviso to sub-sec. (3) of S. 110-A which empowers the Claims Tribunal to condone the delay, if it is satisfi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.