SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 474

S.DASARADHA RAMA REDDY, V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
N. Sudershan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kannamma – Respondent


SIVARAMAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise from the Judgment of our learned brother M. N. Rao, J. in Writ Petition No. 5094/87, whereby he set aside the order of the District Collector, Ranga Reddy District in file No. B/6454/82 Dt. 20-1-1987 and remitted the matter to him for fresh disposal. The learned single Judge by his judgment dt 17-4-1990 had issued certain directions relating to the questions which are to be considered by the Collector, in disposing the matter afresh. The 3rd, 4th and 9th respondents in the Writ Petition have filed these appeals. We will refer to the parties as they were arrayed in the Writ Petition.

( 2 ) ONE Narsing Rao who was an inamdar (Makhtadar) of certain lands. In 1335 Fasli (1925) when survey was conducted, Surveys Nos. 67/1 and 67/2 were assigned to his lands. In the later survey conducted in 1341 Fasli (1931) Survey No. 279 was assigned to that inam land extending to Ac. 49. 39 guntas. Yet another survey was conducted in 1354 Fasli (1944) and Survey No. 279 was divided into Survey Nos. 349, 350, 351 and 352, aggregating Ac. 13. 19 guntas. The remaining extent of Ac. 36. 20 guntas was assigned Survey Nos. 602 and 603. The inamdar Sri Narsin






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top