SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 566

M.N.RAO, N.D.PATNAIK
P. C. Kakar – Appellant
Versus
Commandant, Military Hospital, Trimalgiri – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions are inter-linked : the relief claimed in both is one and the same viz. , for production of the alleged detenu - Captain (Mrs.) Latha Sharma - and her two infant children - Vaman and Pavan - aged 3 and 12 years respectively from the custody of Army authorities and to set them liberty, Because of the commonality of facts and law, we think it proper to dispose of both the writ petition by this common judgment.

( 2 ) W. P. No. 13366 of 1993 was filed by Dr. P. C. Kakar, husband of the alleged detenu - Captain (Mrs) Latha Sharma and W. P. No. 14776 of 1993 by Dr. P. C. Kakar and the detenu, Captain Latha Sharma. In the first writ petition two learned advocates - M/s. S. R. Sanku and N. N. Guru Gopal filed vakalat but during the pendency of the writ petition, they withdrew from the case. The latter writ petition was filed by Dr. P. C. Kakar as party-in-person. It is not necessary to go into the controversy as to the circumstances under which the two learned counsel withdrew from the case.

( 3 ) WHEN the matter came up for hearing before us, we thought that the assistance of a counsel is very necessary in order to effectively adjudicate the que



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top