SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 228

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : V.SIVARAMAN NAIR
Thirumalareddy Thamasamma - Appellant
Versus
Government Of A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 04-06-92

The power under S. 432, Cr. P. C. may not be exercised during the pendency of an appeal and without consulting the appellate Court. A convicted legislator has no special right to claim immunity from serving his sentence for life.

Headnote:

SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE - ILLEGAL EXERCISE OF POWER - S. 432, Cr. P. C. - SUMMARY

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, widow of a murder victim, challenged the State Government's order suspending the sentence of the 3rd respondent, a convicted murderer and Member of the State Legislature, under S. 432, Cr. P. C. The petitioner alleged that the order was illegal and vitiated by malafide exercise of power, and sought a declaration to that effect.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the Government's order was passed in an illegal and improper manner, and the respondent obtained the order by concealing relevant facts. The Court held that the power under S. 432, Cr. P. C. may not be exercised during the pendency of an appeal and without consulting the appellate Court. The Court also held that a convicted legislator has no special right to claim immunity from serving his sentence for life.

Issues: The issues involved the legality of the State Government's order suspending the sentence of a convicted murderer who was a Member of the State Legislature, and the proper exercise of power under S. 432, Cr. P. C.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the power under S. 432, Cr. P. C. may not be exercised during the pendency of an appeal and without consulting the appellate Court. The Court also held that a convicted legislator has no special right to claim immunity from serving his sentence for life.

Final Decision: The Court quashed the State Government's order suspending the sentence of the 3rd respondent and provided guidelines for the State Government in exercising the power under S. 432, Cr. P. C. in the future. The Writ Petition was allowed with costs payable by respondents 1 and 3.

V. SIVARAMAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER is the widow of late Sri Thirumalareddy Showrireddy, who was murdered at 7. 00 p. m. on 5-10-1987. Police had registered crime No. 86/87 of Gurajala Police Station against the 3rd respondent and 15 others under sections 302 read with S. 34, IPC, as also under sections 324 and 326, IPC. The crime was tried as S. C. No. 351/88 by the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur. It was subsequently transferred to the Court of Session, Ongole, where it was re-numbered as S. C. No. 11/91. The Sessions Judge, Ongole in his judgment dt. 4-10-1991 found the 3rd respondent and three others guilty of offence punishable under S. 302 read with S. 34, IPC. He sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and convicted two other accused under sections 324 and 326. The Sessions Judge acquitted the other accused. 3rd respondent and other accused who were convicted filed Criminal Appeal No. 1035/91 against the conviction and sentence. That appeal is pending. They also filed Criminal M. P. No. 2611/91 for suspension of the sentence and for their consequential release on bail, pending disposal of the appeal. This Court dismissed the application in so far as it related to 3rd respondent and three other accused (A-1 to A-4) and granted bail in respect of A-5 and A-6 who were convicted only under sections 324 and 326 of the I. P. C. 3rd respondent who was the 1st accused in the Sessions case had been elected as Member of the State Legislature from Gurajala Constituency. Since his application for bail was not granted, 3rd respondent was sent to Sub-Jail, Ongole. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent, using his position as M. L. A. got himself admitted in Government hospital Ongole on 5-10-91. He was subsequently referred to the Government General Hospital, Guntur and was housed in a special ward. On the allegation that the 3rd respondent had no ailment which justified his continuance in the hospital, petitioner had filed W. P. No. 3760/92, which was admitted on 17-3-1992. On 16-3-1992, Government issued G. O. Rt. No. 738 Home (Prisons-C) Department, dt. 16-3-1992, suspending the sentence of the 3rd respondent from the date of release till the end of the Assembly Session, for the purpose of enabling him to attend the Session. The order was passed purportedly under S. 432, Cr. P. C. 3rd respondent was released soon thereafter from the General Hospital, Guntur. Petitioner submits that the hospital authorities have been accommodating the 3rd respondent on the pretext of ailment which he was not suffering from.

( 2 ) PETITIONER submits that the order of the State Government under S. 432, Cr. P. C. is illegal and vitiated by malafide exercise of power. She also submits that the Government should not have exercised its power under S. 432 of the Criminal P. C. Petitioner submits further that the Government had no power to suspend the sentence under S. 432, Cr. P. C. without reference to the Court which tried him. She submits that the Government should not have exercised its power for the purpose of subverting an order of the appellate Court refusing to grant bail to the 3rd respondent during the pendency of the appeal. She also submits that the Government granted suspension of sentence of the 3rd respondent only due to extraneous and irrelevant political influences. On these grounds petitioner submits that the order is liable to be set aside. She therefore seeks a declaration that G. O. Rt. No. 738 Home (Prisons-C) Department, dt. 16-3-1992 issued by the 1st respondent is arbitrary, illegal, void and without jurisdiction.

( 3 ) THIS Writ Petition was filed on 23-3-92. It was numbered and posted for admission on 24-3-1992. Government Pleader took notice before admission and requested time for filing counter. My learned brother Syed Shah Mohd. Quadri, J. , ordered that in view of the urgency of the matter, the Writ Petition will be posted on 26-3-92 at 2. 15 p. m. On 27-3-92, after hearing the matter at some length, Quad


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top