SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(SC) 254

B. P. SINHA, J. L. KAPUR, K. N. WANCHOO, K. SUBBA RAO, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR
Sarat Chandra Rabha – Appellant
Versus
Khagendranath Nath – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.PATHAK, L.K.JHA, NAUNIT LAL, SUKUMAR GHOSH

Judgment

WANCHOO, J. : This is an appeal on a certificate granted by the Assam High Court in an election matter. An election was held in the double-member constituency of Goalpara to the Assam Legislative Assembly. Nomination papers were filed on the 19th January, 1957, by a number of persons including Aniram Basumatari (hereinafter called the appellant). He was a candidate for the seat reserved for scheduled tribes. The nomination paper of the appellant was rejected by the returning officer on the ground that he was disqualified under S. 7(b) of the Representation of the People Act No. XLIII of 1951, (hereinafter called the Act). The polling took place on February 25, 1957 and Khagendranath and Hakim Chandra Rabha were elected, the latter being a member of a scheduled tribe. Thereupon an election petition was filed by an elector challenging the election of the two successful candidates on a number of grounds. Of these grounds, however, only two are now material, namely, (1) that the nomination paper of the appellant was wrongly rejected, and (2) that a corrupt practice was committed by the successful candidates inasmuch as voters were carried on mechanically propelled vehicles to t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top