SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 233

S.PARVATHA RAO
G. Nagasaina Rao – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this Writ Petition seeks a Writ especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 2nd respondent i. e. , the university of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, in declining a seat in the Super specialities Course (2nd P. G.) i. e. , M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) for the year 1991-92 to the petitioner and giving admission to the 3rd respondent herein who secured only 9th rank in the entrance examination as against the 2nd rank obtained by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and is therefore violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, etc.

( 2 ) THE petitioner states that pursuant to a notification issued by the 2nd respondent which was published in the eenadu daily, calling for applications to the course of Super Speciality in M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) for the year 1991-92, he applied and appeared for the entrance test. The petitioner obtained second rank and the 3rd respondent herein obtained 9th rank.

( 3 ) AS per Rule 2 of the Rules for admission to Super Speciality (Second P. G.) courses in the Medical Colleges of Andhra Pradesh for the year 1991-92 (hereinaf







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top