Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : S.PARVATHA RAO
G.Nagasaina Rao - Appellant
Versus
Government Of A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 04-08-92
MEDICAL ADMISSIONS - SUPER SPECIALITY COURSES - RESERVATION - LOCAL CANDIDATES - STATE-WIDE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS - INTERPRETATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (REGULATION OF ADMISSIONS) ORDER, 1974 - PARAS 5 AND 6 - APPLICABILITY TO COURSES WITH LESS THAN FOUR SEATS - NEED FOR CLARIFICATION BY AUTHORITIES.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, ranked 2nd in the entrance exam for M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) course at Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, challenged the admission of the 3rd respondent, who ranked 9th, on the grounds that the seat should have been given to him as per merit. The 2nd respondent, the University of Health Sciences, justified the admission of the 3rd respondent based on the reservation policy under Para 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions) Order, 1974, as the college was not a State-wide educational institution.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Gandhi Medical College, though affiliated to the University of Health Sciences, was subject to the control of the State Government and not a State-wide educational institution. Therefore, the one seat in the M. Ch. course in Cardio Thoracic Surgery was subject to the reservation under Para 5 of the Order, which gives preference to local candidates.
Issues: 1. Whether the M. Ch. course in Cardio Thoracic Surgery at Gandhi Medical College is a course of study provided by a State-wide University? 2. Whether the reservation policy under Para 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions) Order, 1974 applies to the said course?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Para 6 of the Order, which deals with reservation in State-wide Universities and State-wide educational institutions, and held that it does not apply to courses with less than four seats. Therefore, the proviso to sub-para (1) of Para 6, which states that there shall be at least one unreserved seat, is also not applicable. 2. The court held that Para 5 of the Order, which deals with reservation in non-State-wide Universities and educational institutions, applies to the M. Ch. course in Cardio Thoracic Surgery at Gandhi Medical College since it is not a State-wide educational institution.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the Writ Petition, holding that the 2nd respondent was justified in giving the seat to the 3rd respondent as per the reservation policy under Para 5 of the Order.
( 1 ) THE petitioner in this Writ Petition seeks a Writ especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 2nd respondent i. e. , the university of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, in declining a seat in the Super specialities Course (2nd P. G.) i. e. , M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) for the year 1991-92 to the petitioner and giving admission to the 3rd respondent herein who secured only 9th rank in the entrance examination as against the 2nd rank obtained by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and is therefore violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, etc.
( 2 ) THE petitioner states that pursuant to a notification issued by the 2nd respondent which was published in the eenadu daily, calling for applications to the course of Super Speciality in M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) for the year 1991-92, he applied and appeared for the entrance test. The petitioner obtained second rank and the 3rd respondent herein obtained 9th rank.
( 3 ) AS per Rule 2 of the Rules for admission to Super Speciality (Second P. G.) courses in the Medical Colleges of Andhra Pradesh for the year 1991-92 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ) the number of seats available in M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic surgery) are one in the Osmania Medical College at Hyderabad and one in the Gandhi Medical College at Hyderabad. Rule 7 deals with method of selection and sub-rule (5) of Rule 7 provides as follows:-"on the dates notified, the candidates according to merit shall be called by the Selection Committee and ask them to opt the centre at his/her choice subject to availability. The Selection Committee shall issue selection order immediately. The selection will be only from among the candidates who physically present themselves when their roll Numbers are called out, in order of merit. "in accordance with the said sub-rule (5) of Rule 7 the candidate who obtained the first rank was given the seat in M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) in Osmania medical College, Hyderabad and the petitioner does not dispute the same. The petitionerdisputes the second seat in M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic Surgery) available in the Gandhi Medical College at Hyderabad being given to the 3rd respondent who obtained the 9th rank.
( 4 ) NOTICE before admission was directed in this Writ Petition on 24-1-1992. On behalf of the 2nd respondent, the Registrar in charge of the 2nd respondent filed the counter affidavit wherein the reason for giving the said second seat to the 3rd respondent was explained. It is stated that the M. Ch. (Cardio Thoracic surgery) department in the Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad is a State-wide educational institution as per the schedule to the Andhra Pradesh educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions) Order, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Order ) read with Clause (e) of Sub-para (1) of Para 2 of the order. But the Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad is an educational institution subject to the control of the State Government and is not included in the said schedule to the Order. It is a non State-wide educational institution and therefore is subject to the reservation under para 5 of the Order. It is further stated that the petitioner herein is not a local candidate in relation to the local area in respect of Gandhi Medical College. As the 3rd respondent is a local candidate in relation to the area in respect of the said College, he had to be given the seat. There is no other local candidate who has obtained a rank higher than that of the 3rd respondent.
( 5 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the stand of the 2nd respondent. He submits that the 2nd respondent-University is a State-wide university with effect from 12-9-1986 by reason of the amendments introduced in Clause (f) of sub-para (1) of Para 2 of the Order by the Andhra Pradesh educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Amendment Order, 1986. He relies on Para 6 of the Order which i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.