SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 397

D.REDDAPPA REDDY, M.N.RAO
A. P. Lingadhari Koya (Ordinary) Association rep – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, rep. by the Under-Secretary, Ministry of Welfare – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS Judgment will dispose of both the writ petitions as they raise common questions. The petitioner in W. P. 9707 of 90 is A. P. Lingadhari Koya (Ordinary) association, represented by its Convenor Vibhuti Ramaiah. It was filed as a public interest litigation questioning the legality of an order issued by the government of Andhra Pradesh in Memo No. ll29 / Sl / 89-l, dated 23-4-90 by which the Government directed that"every case in which a claim for issue of a Scheduled Tribe Community certificate on the basis of the applicant s caste as belonging to Lingadhari koya (ordinary) should be referred to Director, Tribal Cultural Research and Training Institute for clearance before issue of Scheduled Tribe community certificate. "the memorandum also directed all authorised officers to refer all such cases to the Director, Tribal Cultural Research and Training Institute (for short Director, tribal) before issue of certificates and all educational institutions in the State were required to insist on clearance from the Director, Tribal, before accepting the certificate submitted by any one as belonging to Lingadhari Koya (ordinary) tribe.

( 2 ) W. P. NO. 13992 of 91 was






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top