SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(AP) 557

I.P.RAO
Commissioner, Andh. Pra. Charitable and Religious Institutions and – Appellant
Versus
Vijendra Kumar – Respondent


IMMANENI PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants are the appellants in this appeal. The respondents filed a suit for declaration that the order of the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments, Gun-tur, dated 28-2-1977 in O. A. No. 66/75 holding that the Hanuman Temple situated at Bade Chowdi, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the Temple ) is a public temple, is null and void, inoperative and that the entry dated 11-11-1342 Fasli registering the temple in the Books of Endowments and the subsequent publications made are null and void, unauthorised, illegal and not binding on the plaintiffs.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiffs in brief is that their grand-father, Ram Harak Tiwari has purchased the site on 18-12-1302 Fasli from one Kondaiah under Ex. A-42, sale deed, constructed a super-structure with tin roof, which is used as his residence and has installed Hanuman idol in the said premises bearing No. 170, Residency Bazar, Hyderabad, which is now re-numbered as Municipal No. 4-2-123, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. Accoridng to the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs grandfather during his lifetime and after his death the plaintiffs father Gorakhnath Tiwari performed pooja and that after the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top