V. NEELADRI RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE Plaintiffs in O. S. No. 327/90 on the file of the Principal Subordinate judge, Tirupati are the revision petitioners. The suit was filed for permanent injunction. The petitioners also filed IA No. 2131/90 praying for temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. That petition was allowed and temporary injunction was granted. Being aggrieved, the defendants respondents filed CM A No. 4/91 on the file of the 3rd Additional District judge, Tirupati. They also filed IA No. 224/91 praying for interim suspension of the Order of temporary injunction granted by the trial court. When the said petition had come up for consideration, it was made krown to the court that the plaintiffs filed a caveat. The relevant portion of the order of the appellate court reads thus :"i am of the opinion, even though there is caveat petition, it is expedient and it is necessary to pass some orders as per the represen- ation made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner as the respondents are found to damage the property by cutting the trees etc. Under the circumstances, interm stay of the order of the Lower Court is ordered and urgent notice by 19-2-91". This order is assai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document