SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(AP) 534

N.D.PATNAIK
Josyula Hanuma Venkata Rao – Appellant
Versus
Nandam Subbarayudu – Respondent


N. D. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the plaintiff in O. S. 530/1976 in the court of District munsif, Tanuku. The plaintiff filed the suit against 14 defendants for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants 1 to 13 to remove unauthorised construction of walls etc. on the road margin in Lingala street in Penugonda village adjacent to the northern side of the plaintiff s house and for costs of the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff s case is that in the road margin between his compound wall and the road there is a space of about 3 yards width which is road margin and defendants 1 to 13 have constructed a building on the road margin with the avowed object of installing a deity in spite of the plaintiff s objection that it will interfere with the access to the Street. The defendants 1 to 9 and 13 contended that the Mandapam was constructed in 1968 and the deity has to be installed and walls are being constructed to prevent its exposer to Sun and rain but the plaintiff himself encroached into the road margin and constructed a pial and opened a doorway and he has no legal right to occupy the road margin. They also contended that the temple is not causing any obstruction to the pla








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top