SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 204

I.P.RAO
Chakala Anjappa – Appellant
Versus
Betappagari Anjaneya alias Anjappa – Respondent


IMMANENI PANDURANGA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE first defendant is the appellant herein. The suit was originally filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff s possession over the plaint schedule properties. Subsequently, the plaint was amended seeking the relief of declaration of title. The plaintiff is the father-in-law as well as the sister s husband of the first defendant. The second defendant is the elder brother of the first defendant and the third defendant is the mother of defendants 1 and 2. The fourth defendant is another sister of the first defendant. The suit property consists of two items of wet land measuring Ac. 1. 23 cents and Ac. 1. 74 cents, and a house constructed on seven Ankanams of site together with a well and a pump set.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs case is that he purchased the unit property and some other properties from the second defendant who executed Ex. A-1 sale deed on his behalf and on behalf of the first defendant as karta of the joint family to meet the expenditure for digging a well and for family necessity, that the first defendant did not take any steps to get the sale set aside after attaining majority; that the p























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top