SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 149

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, V.NEELADRI RAO
Government of A. P. Represented by the Superintending Engineer (R and B), Vijayawada – Appellant
Versus
East Coast Techno Industries (P) Ltd, Visakhapatnam – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ALL these four matters arise from arbitration proceedings and can be disposed of under a common order. All of them are preferred by the state of Andbra Pradesh.

( 2 ) TWO agreements were entered into between the State of Andhrapradesh and the respondent contractor herein on 31-10-1973 for widening and strengthening the Madras-Calcutta Trunk Road, between M. 532 to 544. They were lumpsum contracts. The first contract was for a value of Rs. 38,26,385/, and the second contract for a sum of Rs. 17 lakhs. The work had to be completed within three years of the handing over of the site. Site had been handed over to the respondent even on 14-3-1973, i. e, several months prior to the said agreements, under a provisional K-2 Agreement. Accordingly, the work had to be completed on or before 14-3-1976. By 14-3-1976 the respondent did work of a value of Rs. 6,60,000/ only. He did not carry on any work thereafter. The contracts were terminated on 25-10-1976, and the balance work awarded by the Government to a third-party contractor, who completed the same. The Government says, in that. connection it suffered a loss of Rs. 23 Lakhs. The respondent claimed a huge amount of m





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top