M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that inspite of anorder of injunction granted in his favour by the Civil Court in I. A No. 855/ 89 on 13-4-89 in O. S. 613/89 and in spite of the service of the said order on the 1st respondent on 15-4-89 restraining the latter from evicting the revision petitioner in an eviction petition in R. C. No. 79/83 from the subject matter of the suit, the 1st respondent, after filing a written statement and filing an application to advance the LA. in O. S. No. 613/89 suddenly proceeded with execution of the eviction order obtained by him in the other proceeding viz. , Rent Control proceedings in R. C. No. 79/83 against one devasabayam and forcibly evicted the petitioner on the mid-night of 3-7-89.

( 2 ) THE position is like this CD facts : One Devasahayam was theowner of the property and the revision petitioner claims to be a purchaser from him under an agreement of sale dated 21-5-77 for Rs. 23,000/ -. The property is described with door No. as 5-9-172/1 Chapal Road, Hyderabad. The petitioner claims to have paid bulk of the consideration. The said Devasahayam sold property bearing Door No. 5-9-172, again in favour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document