SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 17

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, P.R.RAO
A. S. Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


RAMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ petitions are for the issue of an appropriate writ declaring that the restricted connotation of an accountant as chartered accountant in the Explanation to section 44ab of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is unconstitutional and declaring that the petitioners are also eligible to audit the accounts for the purpose of section 44ab of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

( 2 ) THE petitioner in W. P. No. 16961 of 1984 is an income-tax practitioner and petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 in W. P. No. 930 of 1985 are income-tax practitioners and the 3rd petitioner is an advocate. The averments in support of the writ petition may be briefly stated : The petitioners are income-tax practitioners and an advocate who have been practising in tax matters arising under direct tax statutes. The income-tax practitioners are members of the Institute of Income-tax Practitioners. Though the Companies Act provides that the audit of the companies should be done by chartered accountants, an income-tax practitioner or an advocate can file the return and represent the company in the proceedings before the assessing authority and appeals. Section 44ab provides that in respect of a business having turnov

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top