SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 612

K.BHASKARAN, M.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.S.M.QUADRI
Guntupalli Rama Subbayya – Appellant
Versus
Guntupalli Rajamma – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS matter arises out of an order dismissing the petition filed under Order 21 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure to record full satisfaction of the decree. The preliminary question that is involved herein is whether against such order revision lies to this Court or the Civil miscellaneous Appeal. This court has taken two different views by two Division benches in Challa Rama Murtry Vs. P Adinarayana Sons (1) 1984 (1) A W R. 134 and Gapi Reddy Vs. Gopu Thirupathi reddy (2) 1981 (2) A W R. 276.

( 2 ) IN view of the difference of opinion we deem it proper to refer it to a full Bench for final adjudication. This Petition coming on for hearing on Monday the 24th day of August 1987 pursuant to the order of Reference dated 12-4-1986, the Court delivered the following : - judgment (Judgment delivered by Syed Shah mohammed Quadri, J. for himself and for the Hon ble the Chief Justice)

( 3 ) THE short question of significant practical importance that arise in this civil revision petition is whether an order determining any question within sec. 47 CPC, passed after amendment of definition of decree , in proceedings pending on the date of commencement of the Amendment Act, is appeal






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top