SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 16

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Golden Press – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the orders of the Collector, Central Excise, Hyderabad, dated 4-8-1981, passed by him in exercise of his power of review under Section 35a of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a printing Press. According to it, it carries on business as manufacturer of printed cartons and other Printing Jobs; for the purpose of manufacturing Printed Cartons, the raw material i. e. , the card-board, is supplied by the customer who also specifies the content and design of printing. The manufacture of cartons involves printing, cutting, creasing and pasting. The petitioner says that, in this process, printing charges constitute the bulk of the total charges. The manufacture of printed cartons is said to be the main activity of the petitioner. It did not take out a licence under the Central Excises and Salt Act.

( 3 ) ON 13-12-1977, the officers of the Special Checking Squad, Headquarters, Central Excise Department, Hyderabad, visited the premises of the petitioners and registered a case against it for contravention of Rules 9 (1), 174 and 173pp of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, on the ground that, for the perio
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top