SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 19

A.SEETHARAM REDDY, K.RAMASWAMY
Chief Engineer Panchayat raj Dept – Appellant
Versus
B. Balaiah – Respondent


K. RAMASWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE twin cases have converged questions of importance, the elaboration thereof needs the essential facts touching them to be caged in a short compass. C M A. 768/84 arose against 0p. 141/83 to set aside the award under section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, (for short, "the Act ,) and C. R. P. No. 2062/84 arose from 0 P No. 151 /83 to pass a decree under Section 17 of the act in terms of the award dated October 7, 1983, in which the sole arbitrator awarded a consolidated sum of Rs. 19, 76,000/ -. The Court below dismissed the 0 P. and decreed the suit, making the award, the rule of the Court. The dissatisfied State, through its organ, is the appellant and petitioner respectively.

( 2 ) ONE, Ch. Ramalinga Reddy, entered into an agreement dated January 4, 1980, with the Governor of Andhra pradesh through his subordinate, for the construction of an earthen dam and summer storage tank near Darsi in prakasam District, pursuant to the tenders called for. Though the initial contract was for a sum of Rs. 60, 41, 868-80 Ps. it was increased to Rs. 70,70,000/ -. The execution of the work was to be completed by July 31, 1981, but spread beyond the contracted period.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top