SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 154

P.CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Limited – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Electricity Board, Hyderabad – Respondent


RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioners are all H. T. power consumers of one category or others. They seek in common to quash on various grounds the proceedings in B. P. Ms. No. 1014 (Commercial) dated 13-12-1983 (Tariffs 84) issued by the respondent- Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (Board for short) notifying certain revised tariffs to come into force with effect from 15/01/1984. Prior to the impugned proceedings, the tariffs were governed by B. P. Ms. No. 418 (Commercial) dated 2/06/1981 (tariffs 81 ).

( 2 ) DURING the course of arguments, our attention was also drawn to: (1) B. P. Ms. No. 689 dated 17-9-1975 (tariffs 1975); (2) B. P. Ms. No. 772 (Commercial) dated 15-9-1979 (tariffs 1979) and B. P. Ms. No. 807 (Commercial) dated 26-9-1980 (tariffs 1980 ).

( 3 ) THE tariffs consist of three parts: Part A, part -B and part-C. part - A provides for H. T. tariffs which are applicable for supply of electricity to H. T. consumers having loads with a contracted demand not less than 70 KVA or having contracted load exceeding 75 H. P. Part-B provides for L. T. supply. Part-C provides, inter alia, for miscellaneous and general charges.

( 4 ) H. T. consumers in Part-A are broadly




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top