SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 292

A.LAKSHMANA RAO, P.A.CHOUDHARY
Gummala Purushotham Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of A. P. – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDARY, J.

( 1 ) WHILE the petitioner was working as a Reserve Inspector in the Special armed Police, he was removed from the state Government Service with effect from 15-5-1979 The removal of the petitioner from the State Civil Service was not held by any competent authority to be invalid and should, therefore, be held for the present purposes to be in accordance with the service rules made by the Governor of Andhra Pradesh under Article 309 of the Constitution and was in accordance with the requirements of Art. 311 of the Constitution. The petitioner, after his removal from the state Service, took to the study of law degree which he had completed in september, 1982. Without losing much time, he moved the Andhra Pradesh state Bar Council for his enrolment as an advocate. His enrolment papers were filled with the State Bar Council on 25-1-1983, The Enrolment Committee of the State Bar Council, however, thought the petitioner was ineligible to be enrolled as an advocate. It thought that Rule 70 (AAA) of the State Bar council Rules would be a complete bar to his enrolment. According to the State bar Council, Rule 70 (AAA) would disqualify him. Rule 70 (AAA) was framprl by the



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top