SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 321

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Advocate General, A. P. – Appellant
Versus
A. V. Koteswara Rao – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS contempt application has been filed by the Advocate General against the respondent who was acting as an Additional District and Sessions Judge at Cuddapah. I do not propose to mention the various allegations made in the Contempt application but it is sufficient to say that the allegation is that the action of the respondent on 16-4-82 and 4-5-82 amounted to contempt of a stay order granted by this court on 15-4-82 in Crl. MP. 835/82 in Crl. MP 834/82. This contempt application has been filed in the High Court on 2-11-82 and was posted before a learned co-single Judge on 3-12-82 who was the same Judge who passed the stay orders on 15-4-82 and therefore he directed that the contempt case be posted before another learned judge. Thereafter this contempt petition was posted before another learned judge on 7-12-82 who adjourned the matter for a period of six months. Thereafter the petition was first listed before me on 24-6-83 and the learned Advocate General requested for an adjournment by four weeks which was granted by me. The matter was again posted on 19-8-83 and on that day I issued notice before admission and Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, Advocate appear
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top